Helen Weinstein has been supporting Caroline Craido-Perez co-founder @TheWomensRoomUk for the media campaign directed @TheBankofEngland regarding historical women on our stirling bank notes.  

This profile-raising and public conversation has helped gather over 20,000 signatures for the petition.  Hurrah!  This petition is in response to the Bank announcing that the only woman commemorated on a £ Bank note, Elizabeth Fry, will be replaced by a portrayal of Winston Churchill. This will mean, that apart from the Queen whose portrayal is based on heriditary rather than merit, not one woman of note, will be immortalized on our notes, and this gives a terrible message to present and future generations of women.

The twitter sphere has been busy on behalf of the campaign, and we have had great radio and television coverage, also newspapers including: Indie, Guardian, Mail, even Sun!  See below for all the links.

For example Helen and Caroline went on BBC Radio Four for "Woman's Hour" to advocate for historical women to be in the running for our bank notes, and to say that rather than NO women on our bank notes, we should be aiming for 50/50. 

BBC Woman's Hour appearance

BBC Woman's Hour appearance - Photo & Podcast: Helen Weinstein and Caroline Craido-Perez

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p018gh5x

http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/bank-of-england-keep-a-woman-on-english-banknotes

The campaign petitition

Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England, announced Winston Churchill will replace social reformer Elizabeth Fry as the face of £5 notes. This means that, other than the Queen, there will be no women featuring on our English bank notes. 

An all-male line-up on our banknotes sends out the damaging message that no woman has done anything important enough to appear. This is patently untrue. Not only have numerous women emerged as leading figures in their fields, they have done so against the historic odds stacked against them which denied women a public voice and relegated them to the private sphere - making their emergence into public life all the more impressive and worthy of celebration.

People will perhaps say that the Queen appears on all the notes. But the Queen would be there whatever she achieved - she was born into her position. The men on the banknotes - Charles Darwin, Adam Smith, Matthew Boulton, James Watt, and soon, Winston Churchill - are all there because of what they have done, not because of who their parents were.

This decision by the Bank of England is yet another example of women's considerable achievements being overlooked in favour of the usual (male) suspects - and yet another example of how the establishment undervalues the contributions of women to history - and indeed to the present. The significance of this decision is further underlined by the fact that Darwin is actually our oldest note - by two years. Why isn't he being replaced?

This matters.

It matters because young women growing up see a parliament that is 57th equal in the world when it comes to female representation; a media where only 1 in 5 experts is a woman; and a business world where female directors represent only 16.7% of the total.

Currency, as its name suggests, is fundamental to our daily lives. These notes will change hands every hour, every minute, every second. And every time they do, the message will drive a little deeper home: women do not belong in public life - they never have, and they never will.

We call on the Bank of England to reverse this decision, and not add another straw to the establishment weight on the shoulders of young women telling them that they will amount to nothing - after all, their mothers, grandmothers and great-grandmothers didn't. Why should they be any different?

Reverse the decision to replace the only woman on English banknotes with a man. This decision perpetuates the damaging myth that women have contributed nothing to history, and adds to the still persistent sense amongst young women that public life is not for them. We recommend Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Seacole or Rosalind Franklin as suitable replacements.

Sincerely, 
[Your name]

Press coverage

News